Dating is hard.
Choosing a tech stack? Even harder.
At least in dating, you can ghost someone.
In code, you’re stuck with your choices, and your technical debt… for life.
But imagine for a second that tech stacks were people on a dating app. You’re scrolling, hopeful, delusional, and slightly traumatized from your last “project.” Each profile comes with promises, red flags, and the kind of charm that only lasts until deployment day.
Let’s swipe through, shall we?
ReactJS — “It’s not a phase, it’s a lifestyle.”
Bio:
“Just a chill framework (sorry, library) looking for someone who can handle my hooks. I’m modern, flexible, and have commitment issues with state management. Bonus points if you can introduce me to your backend.”
React is the person who shows up to every date wearing designer glasses and saying, “I’m just here for the componentization.” They’ve got 12 side projects they never finished and a new “state management solution” every six months.
They’re charming, addictive, and sometimes, when the build finally runs… they make you believe in love again.
Java — “Reliable, established, and still using the same cologne since 1995.”
Bio:
“I’m not flashy, but I’ll always show up. Type-safe, verbose, and stable. Looking for something long-term, preferably enterprise-level.”
Java is that ex your parents still ask about. The dependable one. The one who always had a plan (and an XML file for it). They’re great with structure, terrible with surprises, and will probably still be around when all your new flings have burned out.
Boring? Maybe. But when your Node app crashes at 2 a.m., guess who’s still running quietly in the background?
Python — “Soft on syntax, deep on meaning.”
Bio:
“Fluent in everything. Machine learning? Sure. Backend? Why not. Data science? Obviously. I’m basically a walking Swiss Army knife, but I promise I’m humble.”
Python is the warm intellectual with an overachiever complex. They’re in therapy, read too much philosophy, and can explain recursion and your emotional trauma.
They’ll help you debug your code and your life… but don’t get too comfortable. Once they move into AI, they might forget you exist.
Node.js — “Let’s move fast and break… everything.”
Bio:
“Asynchronous by nature. I like speed, chaos, and callback hell. You’ll love me at first… and then the dependencies hit.”
Node is that person who convinces you to move in after two dates. You build things fast, you’re having fun… and then one day, nothing works, and they’re like, “It’s not me, it’s your version control.”
They’re spontaneous, high-energy, and somehow the reason your entire relationship is now in node_modules.
C# — “Professional, loyal, and a little misunderstood.”
Bio:
“I might seem corporate, but I’ve got layers (mostly abstraction). I do Windows, web, games, you name it. Just don’t compare me to Java; I’ve evolved.”
C# is the clean-cut dev partner who’s actually cooler than people think. They work 9–5, drink oat milk lattes, and secretly write Unity games on weekends.
They’re not dramatic, just dependable. You don’t brag about them, but when you need stability, who do you call? C#.
Rust — “Emotionally unavailable but worth it.”
Bio:
“I’m safe. Memory-safe. Concurrency-safe. Safety is my love language.”
Rust is that person you date because your therapist said you need “better boundaries.” They make you feel like a better developer — mostly because you’ll have to become one just to keep up.
Hard to learn, but when it works… oh, it works.
PHP — “Hey, I’ve changed!”
Bio:
“I know you’ve heard things. But I’m not that script kiddie from 2007 anymore. I’ve matured, I’ve got frameworks, I’ve got composer, I’m basically rebranded.”
PHP is your messy ex who went to therapy, learned Laravel, and now wants another chance. You’re skeptical, but when your new fling flakes, you see them still running half the internet and think… maybe?
They’re not the love of your life, but they’ll build your website and your confidence back up.
At the end of the day, choosing a tech stack is like dating. You start with excitement, hit a few bugs, and eventually learn that no framework will fix your bad architectural decisions.
The trick is finding one that frustrates you less than it inspires you.
Because whether you’re debugging in tears or pushing to production at 3 a.m., we’re all just developers looking for something that won’t break when life does.
If you laughed, nodded, or suddenly questioned your last repo decision… subscribe to my blog. It’s where tech meets a little bit of therapy, sarcasm, and storytelling from your favorite dev girl who’s just trying to find “the one”… framework, that is.
Days in the Life of Mo 
Leave a Reply