Days in the Life of Mo

It always starts so innocently.

A “small feature.”
A “quick addition.”
A “just one more thing.”

And before you know it, your clean, elegant little project has mutated into a sprawling beast that eats deadlines for breakfast and sanity for lunch.

The Birth of the Beast

I remember one project that began as a simple internal tool, a dashboard, nothing fancy. Just a few filters, a table, maybe a chart or two. By the end of it, the thing had user roles, report schedulers, email notifications, dynamic permissions, and a settings panel that looked like it belonged to NASA’s control center.

It was supposed to take three weeks. It took three months.

And that, dear reader, is what the software world affectionately calls scope creep.

According to PMI (Project Management Institute), about 52% of projects experience scope creep to some degree. Which means at least half of us are out here trying to tame Franken-projects built from too many “quick requests.”

It Always Starts With Love

Scope creep doesn’t announce itself. It doesn’t stomp in wearing muddy boots. It whispers. It’s that sweet client email that starts with “Hey, quick question…” It’s your teammate saying, “Wouldn’t it be cool if…” It’s you, in a moment of caffeine-fueled confidence, thinking, “Actually, I could just add that too.”

And you do. Because you care. Because you want the project to shine. Because “it’ll only take five minutes.”
Spoiler: it won’t.

The Developer’s Dilemma

Developers, especially the ones who take pride in their work, are natural problem-solvers. We see a need, we fill it. We optimize, beautify, and refactor until even our functions feel proud of themselves.

But here’s the catch: every “small improvement” compounds. One tiny addition can ripple across your entire system—new bugs, new logic paths, new dependencies, new tests. Suddenly your once-stable app is hanging by a single semicolon, and your project board looks like a Jackson Pollock painting.

There’s actually psychology behind this. According to research published in Harvard Business Review, people underestimate complexity because of optimism bias… we assume tasks will be quicker and easier than they are. It’s not incompetence; it’s human nature. Developers are dreamers with keyboards.

Containing the Chaos

So how do you stop the monster from growing heads faster than you can code them off?

1. Define the MVP (Minimum Viable Product) — Write it down. Guard it with your life. If an idea doesn’t serve the MVP, it goes into the “next phase” pile.
2. Document Every Change — Not because it’s fun (it isn’t), but because memory is a liar when you’re on your third coffee and a deadline is breathing down your neck.
3. Communicate Relentlessly — Tell clients and teammates what every “small addition” actually costs. Sometimes people just need to hear: “That’s three extra days of work.”
4. Build a ‘Feature Parking Lot’ — This one saved my life. A doc where all cool, non-MVP ideas go to nap. You can revisit them later. (Spoiler: you usually don’t.)
5. Learn to Say No (Nicely) — It’s not a rejection; it’s project self-care.

The Irony of It All

Funny thing? Some of the best ideas come from scope creep. That “unplanned” feature sometimes becomes the star of the show. But the trick is learning when to embrace it, and when to push the keyboard away and say, “Not today.”

Scope creep isn’t evil. It’s just… ambitious. Like a toddler who wants to drive. You can’t let it take the wheel, but you can appreciate the enthusiasm.

In the End

Every developer has that one project they wish they’d left simpler. Every project manager has that haunted look that says, “We should’ve stopped at version 1.0.”

But that’s also the beauty of what we do: we build, we overbuild, and then we learn. So the next time your “small idea” starts growing extra limbs, take a breath, step back, and remember… Frankenstein’s monster was also made with good intentions.

---

If this hit too close to home, subscribe for more honest, chaotic, and occasionally caffeinated dev stories from your local C# girl who’s still learning where to draw the line (and sometimes erases it anyway).